Skip to main content
For employees Search

Organisational development 2025–2026

Is NMH organised to meet the needs of the future? In 2025, we reviewed our organisational structure with the help of an external evaluator, followed by discussions with the various Departments at NMH about the path forward. Follow our timeline below.

Organisation of academic departments approved

The NMH board approved on 5 March the proposal to increase the number of academic departments from 7 to 8, whereby the current Department of Music Theory, Composition, and Music Technology will be divided into two departments starting 1 August 2026. The decision also grants the principal and director the authority to review and adjust departmental affiliations for specific subject areas, and to potentially determine new names for the departments. Additionally, the principal and director are tasked with establishing a new system to manage research fellows' personnel responsibilities. The exact wording of the decision can be found in the board documents.

The workinggroup who address matters related to academic departments and programme coordinators

The working group has been established to focus on organisation and collaboration between programme coordinators and academic department heads. The working group includes department heads Lina Braaten, Ivar Grydeland, and Victoria Jakhelln; programme coordinators Professor Kjell Tore Innervik and Associate Professor Ellen Mikalsen Stabell; and Head of Divi­sion Renate Hauge Sund and Special Advisor Kjetil Solvik. The group's mandate is to evaluate the organisation of academic staff within the seven academic departments and, if necessary, propose alternative organisational models. They are now continuing to work on questions concerning collaboration and the division of roles between department heads and programme coordinators.

Administration

The administrative organisation will be adjusted to reflect the changes made to the academic structure and will, therefore, not be finalised until the Board meeting in June 2026. Administrative departments map key work processes to establish a knowledge base for further work. In addition, Special Advisor Kjetil Solvik has been tasked with drafting several alternative models for administrative organisation. These models, along with the process mapping and input from administrative department heads, will serve as the basis for discussions and further evaluations.

Organisation of R&D

The report paid significant attention to the organisation of R&D. It highlighted that the R&D structure lacks clear mandates, levels of responsibility, and a shared understanding of what R&D activities at NMH should encompass and how they should be followed up. A draft for the R&D strategy has been sent out for consultation and was a topic during thestaff assembly on 8 January 2026. This strategy will serve as an important foundational document for the further organisation of R&D activities at NMH. The goal is to complete the evaluation and assessment of the R&D organisation in time for the Board to decide at its meeting in June 2026.

Delegation overview

A delegation overview has been published on the website (in Norwegian).The delegation overview is a description of the roles and authority of various bodies and functions. Previously, this information was scattered across many different documents adopted at various times. It has now been compiled into one place. The delegation overview was presented to the Board on 11 Desember 2025.

Questions?

The Evaluation Report

Agenda Kaupang’s report identifies strengths and weaknesses in the current organisational structure and provides recommendations and suggestions for changes. These can be found on pages 75 to 76 of the report and are summarised below.

Recommendations from the Report

Why evaluation?

Our strategy and framework conditions challenge us as an organisation. Are we asked ourselves these questions:

  • Are we organised in the best way to achieve the goals in the strategy?
  • How do the organisation's seven academic and six administrative sections function? Can the research centres be organised differently?
  • How does the interaction between academic sections and administrative sections function?
  • How does the division of labour, coordination, and scaling work for task completion and fulfilling our societal mission?
  • Do we have the correct positions and roles we need?
  • How is our ability to adapt to changing framework conditions and expectations?
  • What alternative organisational principles and solutions can/should we consider?

Steering Committee and Project Group

The evaluation was organised as a project.

Steering Committee:

  • Astrid Kvalbein, rector
  • Kristel Mari Skorge, Managing Director

Project Group:

  • John Vinge, Head of depart­ment and Asso­ci­ate Pro­fess­or, Music Education and Music Therapy Department
  • Vivianne Sydnes, Pro­fes­sor, Conducting, Voice and Church Music Department
  • Torben Snekkestad, Pro­fess­or, Jazz, Improvised Music and Traditional Nordic Folk Music Department
  • Camilla Thorkildsen, Head of Depart­ment, Academic Affairs and Research
  • Kai Øderud, Head of Depart­ment, Finance, HR and Archiving
  • Åse Karin Hjelen, Union Representative Parat
  • Roger Arntzen, Union Representative Creo
  • Kjetil Solvik, Special Advisor (Internal Project Manager )