Skip to main content
For employees Search

Organisational development 2025–2026

Is NMH organised to meet the needs of the future? In 2025 and 2026, we have reviewed the organisation, discussed it within the departments and the board, and made some changes. This page provides an overview of the process.

The role of the programme coodinators

A report on the role of the programme coodinators was sent out for consultation on 27 April, with a consultation deadline of 18 May. The working group included Lina Braaten, Ivar Grydeland, Victoria Jakhelln, Kjell Tore Innervik, Ellen Mikalsen Stabell, Renate Hauge Sund, and Kjetil Solvik (the same working group that also worked on the organisation of the academic departments).

Broad Agreement in the Consultation on Fewer Programme Coodinators

Twenty consultation responses were received, showing broad support for the proposals in the report regarding a new programme coodinator structure and adjustments to the division of programme committees. The proposal involves having fewer, overarching programme coodinators with larger and broader areas of responsibility. (See the details in the report on Teams. Link below.)

Work on the collaboration between programme coodinators and academic department leaders, as well as the division of responsibilities, has been postponed until the autumn and may be addressed at the board meeting in December 2026. Instructions for programme coodinators and academic department leaders will be adopted by the board during spring 2027, and the changes will take effect from 1 August 2027.

Organisation of R&D

The report paid significant attention to the organisation of R&D. It highlighted that the R&D structure lacks clear mandates, levels of responsibility, and a shared understanding of what R&D activities at NMH should encompass and how they should be followed up. A draft for the R&D strategy has been sent out for consultation and was a topic during thestaff assembly on 8 January 2026.

A working group tasked with reviewing the organisation of R&D activities has begun its work. See a separate article above.

Organisation of academic departments approved at the Board meeting on 5 March

The department for Music Theory, Composition, and Music Technology will be divided into two sections from 1 August 2026. The decision also allows the pricipal and director to assess and adjust the section affiliation of individual subject areas and, if necessary, establish new names for the sections. Additionally, the pricipal and director are tasked with establishing a new arrangement for personnel responsibility for the research fellows. The exact wording of the decision can be found in the board papers.

Organisation of the Administration approved at the board meeting on 11 June

At the board meeting on 11 June, the administration organisation was up for decision. In addition, the board was briefed on the overall process within the organisational development project – including what is happening with the R&D organisation. See the two articles above.

Delegation overview

A delegation overview has been published on the website (in Norwegian).The delegation overview is a description of the roles and authority of various bodies and functions. Previously, this information was scattered across many different documents adopted at various times. It has now been compiled into one place. The delegation overview was presented to the Board on 11 Desember 2025.

Questions?

The Evaluation Report

Agenda Kaupang’s report identifies strengths and weaknesses in the current organisational structure and provides recommendations and suggestions for changes. These can be found on pages 75 to 76 of the report and are summarised below.

Recommendations from the Report

Why evaluation?

Our strategy and framework conditions challenge us as an organisation. Are we asked ourselves these questions:

  • Are we organised in the best way to achieve the goals in the strategy?
  • How do the organisation's seven academic and six administrative sections function? Can the research centres be organised differently?
  • How does the interaction between academic sections and administrative sections function?
  • How does the division of labour, coordination, and scaling work for task completion and fulfilling our societal mission?
  • Do we have the correct positions and roles we need?
  • How is our ability to adapt to changing framework conditions and expectations?
  • What alternative organisational principles and solutions can/should we consider?

Steering Committee and Project Group

The evaluation was organised as a project.

Steering Committee:

  • Astrid Kvalbein, rector
  • Kristel Mari Skorge, Managing Director

Project Group:

  • John Vinge, Head of depart­ment and Asso­ci­ate Pro­fess­or, Music Education and Music Therapy Department
  • Vivianne Sydnes, Pro­fes­sor, Conducting, Voice and Church Music Department
  • Torben Snekkestad, Pro­fess­or, Jazz, Improvised Music and Traditional Nordic Folk Music Department
  • Camilla Thorkildsen, Head of Depart­ment, Academic Affairs and Research
  • Kai Øderud, Head of Depart­ment, Finance, HR and Archiving
  • Åse Karin Hjelen, Union Representative Parat
  • Roger Arntzen, Union Representative Creo
  • Kjetil Solvik, Special Advisor (Internal Project Manager )